Total Pageviews

Showing posts with label saying. Show all posts
Showing posts with label saying. Show all posts

Friday, June 29, 2012

The Painful Art of Saying "No"

More and more, dog rescue organizations have to turn down dogs. They say it's the economy, the "no-kill-shelter nation," the lack of foster homes, the increasingly older population. Whatever the cause, it's a heartbreaking reality.

Sad woman on phone by Shutterstock

We've heard this from numerous rescues, but never thought about what it must be like to be the person who has to turn down dogs people want to surrender. What must it be like to be a volunteer at a rescue group and have to say no, time after time?

Dogster spoke with Joani Ellis, shelter liaison for Florida Poodle Rescue, to find out more about the fine and crushing art of saying no. Sadly, she is an expert. Her group fields hundreds of calls a month from people wanting to give up their dogs. Old-dog surrenders are common where she is. They often happen when elderly owners can no longer take care of their beloved dogs, and no loved ones step up to take the dog into their own homes.

"Every rescue has these calls, by the hundreds. There is no mathematical algorithm to figure how hard it is to say no in rescue," she says. "Think of how difficult it must be to turn dogs away, again and again and again.

"These volunteers deserve a round of applause for being special enough to handle these rejections with class, grace, and style. But it takes its toll on them. Many cry, many get angry, many quit because of the pain it causes. It leaves a hole in your heart as a rescuer each time you have to say, 'I'm so sorry, we can't help.'"

I've been on the other end of the phone from one such volunteer. At the time, I didn't think what it must have been like for them, but looking back, it was probably just as hard as it was for me.

Franky (left) was a joy, but all rescues said "no." (Photo by Maria Goodavage) It happened 14 years ago, when my daughter, Laura, was a toddler. We had two dogs already, and one day I found a giant Rhodesian Ridgeback mix in the park. I looked around for his owner, and waited and waited, but no one came. He was super hungry. So with toddler in tow, I got the dog into the back of the station wagon with the other dogs and we went home.

I figured it would be a cinch to find this beautiful dog's owners, but he had no tags or microchip, and animal control had no "lost" reports that came close. I let animal control know we had him, and waited for a call from his happy owners. But the call never came. And meanwhile, the newly named and hyperenergetic Franky was getting into everything. He absconded with whole meals I set out on the counter. He knocked down Laura with his exuberance. And he wasn't always thoroughly housetrained.

After a week, my husband basically said, "It's me or the dog." He didn't mean it, of course, but I had to agree. As much as I really liked Franky, all I'd wanted to do was find his owner, not add him to the household. So I called various rescue groups, figuring he'd be a shoo-in.

But no one was taking big dogs. Or crazy dogs. Or not-quite-housetrained dogs. Or dogs with a little pit bull in them (which I didn't see, but others did). Especially the combination of the four. Some of the rescues that might have taken him in today (like Rocket Dog Rescue) didn't exist back then.

Our no-kill shelter turned Franky down for the same reasons, plus they saw it as "owner surrender." And I wouldn't turn him in to Animal Care and Control. I just couldn't. And each time I heard a "no," it seemed unreal. At the last place I called, I asked, "Do any rescues actually rescue?" I was still polite, if rather frustrated.

Liver retriever by Shutterstock

Ellis says that many people looking to surrender get irate because they don't understand why there's no room. They plead: "But you are a rescue, and you are not taking my dog/my mother's dog that we don't want."

Eventually we found a home for Franky on our own. He went to a wonderful couple who had no other dogs and no kids.

But if Franky had been an elderly dog, it might have been impossible to place him. As hard as it was to get him a home (it took more than a month, several broken plates and downed groceries, and a few accidental take-downs of my daughter), I don't want to think about what it would have been like if he were old, and needing medical care.

Rescuers try to explain the difficulties of placing a mature dog. But Ellis says they don't want to hear any metaphoric examples, such as "If you were looking to adopt a child, and we said, 'We have this great 70-year-old who needs a home, wears glasses, plays golf two times a week, makes a mean meatloaf, very clean and tidy,' that wouldn't cut it. No one looking for a child will want to adopt the 70-year-old."

"Many, many times the caller hangs up in frustration," she says. "Then the telephone/intake volunteer takes a deep breath, and it all starts over again.

Old Chihuahua by Shutterstock

Amy Howland, codirector of Dogma Pet Rescue, knows what Ellis's volunteers go through. "Every time we respond to people we can't help, it kills us to say no," she says. "What some do not understand that none of us got into dog rescue to say no to a dog in need, or to say no to a good person in a bad situation trying to do the best for their dog."

Rescues like these might be able to say yes more often if there were more foster homes to house these harder-to-place dogs. More donations for the hugely increased veterinary costs of elderly pets would also enable them to take in more dogs.

If you're inclined to help local, trusted rescue groups by fostering or making donations, some of the more desperate people on the other end of the phone may not have to hear "no" so often.

Have you been on either end of the phone in a situation like this? What was it like?


View the original article here

Thursday, July 28, 2011

Animal control saying ‘yes’ to tax dollars, ‘go away’ to taxpayers

It struck me as odd that so many animal control agencies in different parts of the country were responding in the same way to public calls for reform: by shooting the messenger.

There’s an epidemic spreading through the nation’s animal control shelters, and it’s not something a vaccination can prevent. It’s an epidemic of secrecy.

Consider this: Animal control is a government function, paid for with your tax dollars. It’s work done on behalf of the public; shouldn’t the public have some way to ensure it’s being done appropriately?

But in communities all over the country, including here in California, calls for animal control reform have been met with the sound of a door slamming in the public’s face.

[....]

The Central California SPCA, a private organization that holds the animal control contract for the city of Fresno, recently closed its board meetings to the public, sparking a wave of protests, including a July 19 demonstration organized by FixFresno.org, an advocacy group aimed at ending the killing of healthy and treatable pets in the city’s shelters.

It’s not surprising that citizens want to reform how Fresno’s homeless animals are treated; the CCSPCA kills around 80 percent of the pets it takes in, one of the worst kill rates in California and far above the national average of 50 percent.

Recently, animal rescuers in the community have also been alleging mismanagement, abuse and neglect at the shelter.

Until last month, the CCSPCA’s board meetings were open to the public, but on June 16, the president of FixFresno.org, Melissa McDonald, received a letter from the shelter’s attorney, Jeffrey M. Reid, advising her that the meetings were now closed and members of FixFresno.org would no longer be allowed to attend.

Attendance by FixFresno.org members had been permitted previously, he said, after the group asserted that the board meetings were subject to the Brown Act, California’s open meetings law. However, Reid told them this interpretation of the law was incorrect.

He pointed to what is essentially a loophole in the law, which calls for open meetings of private organizations contracted to do government work only in cases where the organization was created specifically to do that work, or if a member of the government sits on the organization’s board. Neither of those provisions applies to the CCSPCA.

Members of FixFresno.org showed up at the next board meeting anyway, only to be met at the door by Reid.

“He said that having us there was too ‘intimidating’ for the board to function,” McDonald told me. “It is sad that they chose to hide what is going on instead of addressing the problems.”

I called CCSPCA spokesperson Beth Caffrey, and asked what prompted the organization to contact an attorney on this matter in the first place.

“We want our board meetings to be productive,” she told me. “We couldn’t be productive because of the disruptive behavior of people who were there.”

In the rest of the article, I update the situation in Memphis and New York City, and have a great wrap-up commentary from FixAustin.org’s Ryan Clinton. It’s all here.

Photo: Courtesy of Celeste Pryor.


View the original article here